EndNote vs Citavi: Which reference manager is better?

The tasks of managing, storing, organizing, and formatting references are essential yet cumbersome for researchers. Reference management software can assist with these areas.

Choosing the right tool from the plethora of reference management solutions can be overwhelming. To ease the selection process, we compare two reference management systems: EndNote and Citavi.

EndNote vs Citavi: Detailed feature comparison table

Below is a comparison of the main features of both applications. Read on for a detailed description of the differences between the tools.

EndNoteCitavi
Platform Compatibility4/72/7
Web
iOS
Android
Windows
MacOS
Linux
ChromeOS
Web clipper4/54/5
Chrome
Edge
Safari
Firefox
Organize references
Add references to folders within extension popup
Writing Platforms3/42/4
Word on Windows
Word on Mac
Google Docs
Overleaf
Live BibTeX integration with Overleaf
Data Import4.5/65/6
Manual import with auto-completion
Start typing in a title, URL, or DOI and the reference data will be filled automatically
Autocompletion only if identifier entered
Bulk data import
Users can upload RIS, BibTeX, NBIB, and PDF files.
In-app literature search
Bulk import from web databases
Metadata extract from PDFs
Incomplete
Create references from identifiers
Generate references from DOI, PMC ID, arXiv ID, PubMed ID or ISBN
DOI only
Data Export and Backup3/62.5/6
BibTeX
Export BibTeX files
RIS
Export RIS files
Google Drive
Github
OneDrive
Full data export
Export all bibliographic data, labels, folders, and PDF files with annotations
PDFs with highlights, no notes
Sharing and Collaboration2/43/4
Shared folders
Integrated sharing that does not require set up of external folders in other cloud storage apps or databases
Unlimited collaborators
No limit on the number of users who can access a shared folder
Collaborators can add, edit, and remove references
Share references with sharing link
PDF management4/61.5/6
Custom PDF file naming
Sticky notes
Sticky notes are attached to highlights
Highlight annotation
Freehand drawing
Custom highlight colors
Free text annotations
Write anywhere directly on pdf
Library management8/107/10
Labels
Also called tags
Folders
Subfolders
Starred items
Also called favorites. Automatic filtering of important references displayed in UI
Notes
Duplicate detection
Easily spot duplicates in your library
Detect incomplete references
Automatic filtering of incomplete references
Auto-update reference metadata
Get reference data updates automatically
Add-in needed, gets data by DOI or PMID
Find full text PDFs
Bulk editing of references
Not all fields
Library search5/66/6
Full-text PDF Search
Include full text in search
Exact phrase search
Over library (fields and full-text pdfs)
Author search
Search author field
Notes search
Include notes in search
PDF annotations search
Include PDF annotations in your search
Highlight search terms in search results
Citing3/42/4
Copy citation to clipboard
Choose citation style
(Word, Google Docs)
Word only
Cite from library
(Word, Google Docs)
Word only
Cite from online search
LaTeX Support0/33/3
Copy BibTeX to clipboard
Create custom BibTeX key pattern
BibLaTeX support
Export .bib file with BibLaTeX fields
Support and Community2/32/3
Community forum
Customer support via in app chat
Customer support by email
Pricing
Free version (e.g., short-one time project)
30 day free trial
EndNote Online can be used for free
30 day free trial
Academic user subscription price
$275 for 3 years unlimited cloud storage
$175/year for up to 5GB cloud storage

What is EndNote?

EndNote is reference management and citation formatting software for academics. It is developed by Clarivate Analytics.

EndNote 21 screenshot

What is Citavi?

Citavi is a reference management, knowledge organization, and task management tool for academic researchers. It was recently acquired by QSR International (Lumivero).

Citavi screenshot

EndNote vs Citavi: 4 factors to consider

When considering whether to opt for EndNote or Citavi for reference management, your choice will depend on four major factors:

  • Cost. You need to purchase licenses to use both EndNote and Citavi. An EndNote license is priced at $275 and it includes the desktop app, EndNote Web, and unlimited cloud storage. You can buy a Citavi academic subscription that includes Citavi Web and 5GB cloud storage for $175. A perpetual license costs $291 and comes with 5GB cloud storage for two years. Both EndNote and Citavi offer 30 day free trials.
  • Platform compatibility. Citavi’s desktop app is only available on Windows. You need to use the web app (which does not have the full feature set of Citavi for Windows) to access it on other platforms. EndNote, on the other hand, is available on Windows and MacOS. Unlike Citavi, it also has an iOS app.
  • Word processing and text editor integrations. EndNote 21 integrates with a wide range of word processing platforms: MS Word, Google Docs, Apple Pages, and Open Office. In contrast, Citavi has an add-in for Word, but Citavi doesn’t integrate with other common document writing tools. But it does have more LaTeX and BibTeX capabilities than EndNote.
  • Task planning and knowledge management needs. Citavi supports knowledge management and task planning, as well as reference management. EndNote’s focus is on reference management only.

EndNote vs Citavi: EndNote has a more straightforward UI than Citavi

Citavi combines reference management with knowledge organization and task planning in a single project. You navigate between the three core features through three tabs:

  • Reference Editor (References tab): Has reference management features and a list of all references in your project.
  • Knowledge Organizer (Knowledge tab): Consists of a list of all PDF annotations. Work with your notes here.
  • Task Planner (Tasks tab): A list of all planned tasks in your project.

The menu at the top of the interface differs for each of these features.

In the references and knowledge tabs, you can choose to show keyword, category, and group columns by clicking on the appropriate buttons. Each feature helps you categorize your references and annotations:

  • Categories are useful for the hierarchical organization of references and annotations in a research project, such as sections of a paper or chapters of a thesis.
  • Keywords allow you to organize references and annotations by topic.
  • Groups help you categorize citations and notes not connected with the topic of your references, for example, “Papers to read” or “Preprint”.

In the Reference Editor, you may have up to four panels open at once:

  • Categories/keywords/groups column
  • Your reference list under that category/keyword/group
  • A panel with the information of the selected reference under various tabs (overview, reference data, PDF annotations, groups/categories/keywords associated with it, tasks)
  • A preview pane (you can view the PDF attached to the reference here).
Citavi's reference editor

In addition, there is a series of menus and buttons crammed in at the top of the interface, making it an altogether rather bewildering experience for a new user.

Some Citavi features are difficult to find. For example, importing a PDF using File > Import in the Reference Editor will not detect the metadata of the PDF. But, if you click the ISBN, DOI or other ID button, there is an option to import a file in the “Retrieve references by identifier” dialog, which will obtain the reference data.

Citavi's retrieve references by ID feature

In contrast, EndNote has a relatively straightforward interface that is solely designed for managing references and integrating with word processors for citation management. The interface includes a panel on the left for different groups and tags (collections of references) in EndNote, the list of references, and a search box at the top.

Unlike Citavi, you don’t need to switch columns to view your reference collections in EndNote because all of your groups and tags are listed vertically in the left panel.

EndNote's left panel

EndNote vs Citavi: Citavi has more organization features for PDF annotations than EndNote

Citavi allows users to organize PDF annotations by saving quotations, comments, and ideas with references.

You can access your knowledge annotations outside of the PDFs under the Knowledge tab. Viewing all your project’s annotations in one place can help you make connections between disparate ideas.

Citavi's knowledge tab

Unlike Citavi, EndNote focuses on reference and citation management without built-in organization features except for creating reference collections (Groups and Tags in EndNote). PDF annotations cannot be accessed as a group outside of the PDFs.

EndNote vs Citavi: EndNote has more advanced reference management features than Citavi

EndNote better addresses advanced reference management needs than Citavi.

  1. It’s easier to export your data from EndNote than Citavi. You can access annotated PDFs in a folder on your computer and you can export your reference data in a variety of formats. In contrast, Citavi’s export options under File > Export are more limited than EndNote’s. The option to export references to MS Excel is not available under File > Export but under References > Table instead. While PDFs can be found in a folder in a computer, the comments attached to the highlights are not included. But you can export these annotations separately under Knowledge > File > Print or Save compilation > Save with options, which allows you to save all your knowledge items as a Word document, text file, or PDF.
  2. EndNote offers a range of options for customizing the names of PDF attachments in its Preferences dialog. PDF handling options include Author + Year + Title, Author + Year, Author + Title, Title, and Custom. Citavi, on the other hand, only permits one name type for references (short titles must have the Author + Year + Title format) and you can’t batch modify these names. But you can change short titles individually.
  3. It’s easy to edit references in bulk in EndNote by going to Library > Find and Replace to make changes to multiple reference fields simultaneously. In Citavi, the Search and Replace feature allows you to edit some Citavi fields in bulk, but Author and Publishers are not included in this list. You need to go to the Lists menu and merge the entries to edit these fields.

EndNote vs Citavi: Citavi has more BibTeX And LaTeX features than EndNote

Citavi lets you:

To use Citavi’s LaTeX and BibTeX features, you need to enable LaTeX support in the Tools menu by clicking Options > Citation and checking the LaTeX support box.

Unlike Citavi, EndNote has only minimal functionalities for LaTeX users. You can export references as BibTeX files from EndNote and import BibTeX files to your library by choosing the BibTeX filter, but it does not have any advanced BibTeX output customization options.

EndNote vs Citavi: Which is better?

Both tools can help you manage your citations but the answer will depend on your needs and preferences.

EndNote is the better option if:

  • You require extensive reference management options
  • You need a mobile app and integrations with word processing tools other than MS Word.

Citavi is the better option if:

  • You need a tool that can help you manage PDF annotations and references together
  • You are a LaTeX user.

Since both products offer a free trial, you can try both out and see which product suits your needs best.

How to import your references from Citavi to Paperpile

How to move your EndNote library to Paperpile

EndNote vs Zotero: Which one to choose?

All your papers in one place. Nice and tidy.